Reply With Quote
I wish they would put out the factory threaded model in the Mark 3. I had a 22/45 and traded it off because I could not shoot it nearly as well as the Mark 2 or 3 models.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
01-21-2011, 12:22 PM #1Staff - Purveyor of Kydex
Shootist
Classified Feedback: 127
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Alamance County, NC
- Posts
- 11,982
- Blog Entries
- 4
New Ruger 22/45 Models with factory threaded barrels
Subscribe to Remove Post Ads (Also enjoy site upgrades, unlimited photo storage, 1,000 private messages, and more!)Interesting:
http://www.ruger.com/products/2245Th...el/models.html
Not on my short list of things I want, but I'm glad to see them offering these models.The answer to this question is straightforward: The purpose of having citizens armed with paramilitary weapons is to allow them to engage in paramilitary actions. The Second Amendment is not about Bambi and burglars — whatever a well-regulated militia is, it is not a hunting party or a sport-clays club. It is remarkable to me that any educated person — let alone a Harvard Law graduate — believes that the second item on the Bill of Rights is a constitutional guarantee of enjoying a recreational activity. - Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
-
01-21-2011, 12:33 PM #2
-
01-21-2011, 12:57 PM #3Staff - Purveyor of Kydex
Shootist
Classified Feedback: 127
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Alamance County, NC
- Posts
- 11,982
- Blog Entries
- 4
I'm tit for tat with both. I've got an early 22/45 (before the mkIII version and lawyer features) a Mark II and a Mark I. I shoot them all about the same.
I don't particularly care for the magazine disconnect, lock, and loaded chamber indicators and have sold every MKIII that I've owned eventually.The answer to this question is straightforward: The purpose of having citizens armed with paramilitary weapons is to allow them to engage in paramilitary actions. The Second Amendment is not about Bambi and burglars — whatever a well-regulated militia is, it is not a hunting party or a sport-clays club. It is remarkable to me that any educated person — let alone a Harvard Law graduate — believes that the second item on the Bill of Rights is a constitutional guarantee of enjoying a recreational activity. - Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
-
01-21-2011, 01:02 PM #4Club Subscribed
Gunslinger
Classified Feedback: 3
- Join Date
- Jun 2009
- Location
- Durham, NC
- Posts
- 1,266
Ditto, thats why I went with the MKII 22/45 also. I do like those RP ones though, I might pick one up anyway.
Originally Posted by rantingredneck
-
01-21-2011, 01:32 PM #5Staff - Purveyor of Kydex
Shootist
Classified Feedback: 127
- Join Date
- Aug 2007
- Location
- Alamance County, NC
- Posts
- 11,982
- Blog Entries
- 4
Yeah, the RP models do add a bit to balance out my not wanting the newer features. Originally Posted by morgantm
The answer to this question is straightforward: The purpose of having citizens armed with paramilitary weapons is to allow them to engage in paramilitary actions. The Second Amendment is not about Bambi and burglars — whatever a well-regulated militia is, it is not a hunting party or a sport-clays club. It is remarkable to me that any educated person — let alone a Harvard Law graduate — believes that the second item on the Bill of Rights is a constitutional guarantee of enjoying a recreational activity. - Kevin D. Williamson, National Review
-
01-21-2011, 01:41 PM #6
I like the top rail, don't care for the bottom, not a pistol I would be putting a light on, and it looks kinda stupid.
"Like a mustache with titties"
-
01-21-2011, 04:47 PM #7
I guess I have one of the lawyer models(Mark III Hunter). I like the threaded barrel option on the 22/45, any recommendations on a silencer for this model?
Bookmarks