Assuming a short barrel setup (somewhere between 7" and 11.5" or whatever works to keep commercially available .45 ACP subsonic), what are the pros/cons of .45 ACP vs subsonic 300 BLK in terms of terminal performance, suppression, reliability, etc.?
Obviously .45ACP wins by a long margin in terms of current ammo cost and availability, especially for those who don't reload. 300BLK wins for ease/cost of build for someone who already has 5.56 gear, and also wins for reliability if we're comparing to an AR-45 setup, as opposed to an off-the-shelf .45ACP carbine. And obviously 300BLK gives you the option of going supersonic and getting 7.62x39-like ballistics with just a mag change.
What else?
Obviously .45ACP wins by a long margin in terms of current ammo cost and availability, especially for those who don't reload. 300BLK wins for ease/cost of build for someone who already has 5.56 gear, and also wins for reliability if we're comparing to an AR-45 setup, as opposed to an off-the-shelf .45ACP carbine. And obviously 300BLK gives you the option of going supersonic and getting 7.62x39-like ballistics with just a mag change.
What else?