Carolina Shooters Forum banner

Looking for a new 40 cal for competition

2.9K views 47 replies 26 participants last post by  hardluk1  
#1 ·
Ok so recently started to really like the 40 cal since I got my glock 27. Shot it in an idpa match yesterday and while I liked it I don't think it makes the best gun for that style of shooting. I've tried a 23 and 22 and honestly I like the way the 27 feels more than those so am looking at branching out. I've heard good things about hk and sig when it comes to 40 so figure my search starts there. I've shot someone's sig x5 in 40 and absolutely loved it but don't have 2k to blow in order to get one.

What do you guys suggest? I know some of you have to be 40 cal aficionados
 
#2 ·
If you like the manual of arms of the Glock, take a long look at the Springfield XD. It operates on the same point and shoot method and I think it has a nicer trigger and ergonomics than the Glock.
 
#12 ·
Before you settle on something get your hands on a Stoeger Cougar 8040. I bought mine a little over a year ago. One of the BEST handguns purchase decisions I ever made. Great ergonomics. Accurate. Reliable. Sexy.

These were originally made by Beretta. They were originally designed around the .40 as they were looking to sell to law enforcement. When first released Beretta was asking near $600 for them. At that price they didn't move. Beretta moved the machinery to Turkey where they are made and sold under the Stoeger name. Stoeger is owned by the same company that owns Beretta. For repairs you ship it to Beretta in Maryland. If you need parts you get them from Beretta.

Sold my G22 to buy mine.

All the Best,
D. White

Image
 
#15 ·
Of course, with 10-rd mags and minor PF reloads, you don't actually lose anything in IDPA either. I suppose you would gain maybe 1 point or so in a match where the .40 bullet makes a bigger hole and breaks a perf where the .355 one wouldn't... or something....
 
#18 ·
To tag along with @FlatFender, you have three options for IDPA

1) Shoot factory .40, be at a bit of a disadvantage
2) Reload .40 to 9mm levels (aka minor power factor), and not be at a disadvantage
3) Just buy a 9mm and either load for it or shoot cheap factory ammo.

Of the three, I'd go with #3.

You say you like the feel of the 27, and not the 22, but you prefer to stay with a Glock. Maybe a Glock 26 (or 19) and shoot CCP division with the other carry guns instead of SSP with the full size guns?
 
#21 ·
Before you settle on something get your hands on a Stoeger Cougar 8040. I bought mine a little over a year ago. One of the BEST handguns purchase decisions I ever made. Great ergonomics. Accurate. Reliable. Sexy.

These were originally made by Beretta. They were originally designed around the .40 as they were looking to sell to law enforcement. When first released Beretta was asking near $600 for them. At that price they didn't move. Beretta moved the machinery to Turkey where they are made and sold under the Stoeger name. Stoeger is owned by the same company that owns Beretta. For repairs you ship it to Beretta in Maryland. If you need parts you get them from Beretta.

Sold my G22 to buy mine.

All the Best,
D. White

View attachment 129713
I recently aquired an italian made couger from a club member, wow is it nice to shoot.
 
#34 ·
I'm shooting .40 in IDPA because I got a smoking deal on an STI Eagle in .40 shooting 180 gr.Blue bullets with 3.2 titegroup makes 132 PF shoots everybit as soft as the 147 9mm loads also using it for 3 gun only downside is in 3G I only get 19-20 in a mag vs. 22-23 most 9mm shooters are using ( although I rarely have problems knocking down steel targets )
 
#38 ·
I ain't a .40 fan but only because I've got too much invested in .45 to branch out. That being said, I just got a FN FNX45 that's DA/SA, hammer fired, safety/decocker, fully ambidextrous, comes w/3 mags, not super expensive and soft shooting. I would highly recommend you take a look at the FNX40.

C.S.
 
  • Like
Reactions: toddje
#39 ·
+1 Unless you're a *prolific* shooter (5k rds/year or more, probably) then the cost of converting from .40 or .45 to 9mm may not be worth it. Plus, it's just a game. You want to shoot a .40, get one. I had a P226 in .40 that I never should have sold. It was awesome. Anyway...
 
#42 ·
I'm not a huge 40 fan, so I can't say which is better, but I have read nothing but good in the Sigs in 40, they are built like tanks and can handle the load, and are some damn sweet shooting guns. If I could get over the first DA shot I would have a stable of them.

I would go and feel both, shoot both if you can, and see which you like best
 
#43 ·
I love the P226 and I never should have gotten rid of my P226 in .40. I'd never think of using that as a concealed carry piece, though (nor would I a Glock 34/17 but that's just me) - I might look at that new P320 too if my tax return comes back larger than expected. Either way, I'd recommend just getting a used base model because IDPA/USPSA will take a toll on the finish.