But again, what could you ever do about it? Any why would you want to? Are we to sell out the First Amendment in defense of the Second?On the other hand, movies and video games, which are being totally ignored in the gun control full-court press, seemed to have influence both James Holmes and Adam Lanza.
The gun rights folks don't need to do anything about it - just publicize the hypocrisy and let the gun control advocates defend their decision to focus exclusively on guns while ignoring movies/video games, which studies demonstrate have a desensitizing effect on people. I.e., put those pushing gun control legislation between a rock and a hard place.But again, what could you ever do about it?
That's what I'm saying. If, on the off chance they take you up on the suggestion to start campaigning against video games instead of guns, what have we really accomplished? Two wrongs don't make a right.The gun rights folks don't need to do anything about it - just publicize the hypocrisy and let the gun control advocates defend their decision to focus exclusively on guns while ignoring movies/video games, which studies demonstrate have a desensitizing effect on people. I.e., put those pushing gun control legislation between a rock and a hard place.
A government that can censor the press like you're suggesting can also take your guns away from you, so if you think you can trade one for the other, you're going to find yourself without either before long.If we could tell the media "Thou Shalt Not print the names or faces of killers" Holmes, Lanza and any other pathetic psycho loner would never get the bright idea that shooting up a crowded room will put them on the glorious pantheon of assassins, serial killers, and mass murderers. We love to hate our monsters and it's so easy to go from nobody to anti-hero. We need to cut off the shortcut from obscurity to fame.
LOL. Do you think there is any chance that the Democrats are going to screw Hollywood? I don't think so.That's what I'm saying. If, on the off chance they take you up on the suggestion to start campaigning against video games instead of guns, what have we really accomplished? Two wrongs don't make a right.
I realize this and I'm just venting a bit. However, I'd just like to point out that they (the FCC) can and DO censor the press now.A government that can censor the press like you're suggesting can also take your guns away from you, so if you think you can trade one for the other, you're going to find yourself without either before long.
Divide and conquer what? Who? The Civilian Disarmament Crowd doesn't doesn't care about video games. They're trying to take something away from you, and your response is to suggest that they take something away from someone else instead? It's a fruitless distraction to spend time thinking about movies and video games as a viable tactic to preserve 2A rights.Divide and conquer. Just like they are attempting to do to gun owners.
I don't either, but that doesn't mean it does any good to offer up a completely unrelated side-issue as part of the debate about guns. Like I said, two wrongs don't make a right, and even less so if one of them turns out to be a big bunch of nothing.LOL. Do you think there is any chance that the Democrats are going to screw Hollywood? I don't think so.
They regulate over-the-air broadcast transmissions and that's all. Cable, satellite, print, internet, etc. are not under FCC regulation.I realize this and I'm just venting a bit. However, I'd just like to point out that they (the FCC) can and DO censor the press now.
Divide liberals.Divide and conquer what? Who? The Civilian Disarmament Crowd doesn't doesn't care about video games. They're trying to take something away from you, and your response is to suggest that they take something away from someone else instead? It's a fruitless distraction to spend time thinking about movies and video games as a viable tactic to preserve 2A rights.
There's nothing for them to defend, because addressing video games is as much of a non-solution as gun control is.Make those proposing gun control legislation defend the decision to do nothing about the glorification of violence in movies and video games.
We will have to agree to disagree. I think movies and television are a corrupting influence - and not just on children (more than a few women have abandoned their families after watching Eat, Pray, Love). Anyone familiar with Alfred Bernays' work understands that this programming can bypass the cerebrum and make an impact in the limbic brain.There's nothing for them to defend, because addressing video games is as much of a non-solution as gun control is.
That's a very small risk. Everything has a risk. Driving may have more of a risk of harming someone than taking these meds. Statistically speaking they are very effective and successful at helping some people live a normal life.EDIT: Psychotropic drugs may very well have something to do with people killing people.
^^ This. Its about the hypocrisy. Then again how much money was contributed to the BHO Campaign from Hollywood? Im sure alot more than pro-gun organizations. Politics are all about special interest, lobbyist and money, but tose are all the same arent they?I'm only posting to point out the hypocrisy of this entire gun control initiative. Nothing being proposed would have prevented Aurora or Newton.
On the other hand, movies and video games, which are being totally ignored in the gun control full-court press, seemed to have influence both James Holmes and Adam Lanza.