http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/09/opinion/shane-smarter-guns/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
This can't be serious....
This can't be serious....
Guns should also be designed to sense where they are being aimed. Artificial vision and optical sensing technology can be adapted from military and medical communities. Sensory data can be used by built-in software to disable firing if the gun is pointed at a child or someone holding a child.
Guns should also be designed to sense where they are being aimed. Artificial vision and optical sensing technology can be adapted from military and medical communities. Sensory data can be used by built-in software to disable firing if the gun is pointed at a child or someone holding a child.
That programming magic being the case, maybe we it can have SAFE, FIRE and "kill stupid people" settings.
As long as you didn't spank them I won't have to turn you in.....Guns might have feelings too. I've yelled at mine when they are off target...
This has to be in my signature, you will get the credit of course!That will just perpetrate armed gangs of midgets to rule us all.
But what if they've been extra naughty?As long as you didn't spank them I won't have to turn you in.....
How might this work? Start with locational "self-awareness." Guns should know where they are and if another gun is nearby. Global positioning systems can meet most of the need, refining a gun's location to the building level, even within buildings. Control of the gun would remain in the hand of the person carrying it, but the ability to fire multiple shots in crowded areas or when no other guns are present would be limited by software that understands where the gun is being used.
Nothing a good spanking wouldn't fix. Wait, wut?But what if they've been extra naughty?